Alternatives in portfolio context — due diligence + sizing
In this chapter: Investment due diligence (IDD) · Operational due diligence (ODD) · Pacing model for PE/VC · Liquidity tiering
Adding alternatives to portfolio improves risk-adjusted returns but creates manager-selection risk + liquidity constraints. CFA L3 tests both.
**Due diligence levels**: **Investment DD (IDD)**: - Strategy: edge, capacity, scalability. - Track record: returns, drawdowns, attribution. - People: pedigree, retention, succession. - Process: discipline, repeatability. - Performance metrics: Sharpe, IR, alpha, factor exposures. **Operational DD (ODD)**: - Trade execution. - Counterparty management. - Custody. - Valuation policies (especially for illiquid). - Compliance + legal. - Audit, financial controls. - Key-person risk. - Cybersecurity. Most hedge fund failures are operational, not investment-related. Madoff was 100% operational red flag.
Pacing model for PE: - Target ultimate allocation: e.g., 15% to PE. - Vintages mature over 8-12 years (J-curve). - Need to commit ~4-5x annual deployment to reach steady state. - Build commitment schedule across vintages to maintain target. Liquidity tiering: - Tier 1 (daily): listed equities, bonds, ETFs. - Tier 2 (monthly-quarterly): hedge funds with redemption. - Tier 3 (annual+): PE, VC, real estate, infra. Lock-up + secondary market for liquidity. Portfolio constraint: liquidity demands of investor / liability profile. For pension: long-horizon → larger Tier 3 OK. For endowment with 5% spending: ~80% liquid, ~20% illiquid OK. For foundation with redemptions: more liquid.
L3 essay: "Allocate $500m for university endowment to alternatives. Recommend due diligence framework + portfolio targets." Framework: 1. Define role of alternatives (return enhancement, diversification, inflation hedge). 2. Set target allocation: 30% (Yale-like) or 15-20% (more conservative). 3. Manager selection process: - Screen for IRR, MoM, IR over multiple cycles. - IDD + ODD before commitment. - Diligence sources: GP communications, LPs, references. 4. Pacing: 4x annual commitment to reach 30% target. 5. Concentration limits: max 5% to single fund. 6. Reporting: NAV-based for PE, marked daily for hedge funds.
- SEBI AIF Regulations 2012
- CFA Institute Alts curriculum
- Underweight ODD — operational failures cause big losses.
- Over-committing to alternatives without liquidity buffer.
- Concentration in single fund or vintage.
Frequently asked
Why is ODD as important as IDD?
How much liquidity buffer to keep?
Practice questions
Click each question to reveal the answer and explanation.
Q 1ODD focuses on:- (a)Investment strategy
- (b)Operations, controls, custody
- (c)Track record
- (d)Manager pedigree
- (a)Investment strategy
- (b)Operations, controls, custody
- (c)Track record
- (d)Manager pedigree
Q 2PE pacing model:- (a)Annual commitment to maintain target
- (b)Single lump sum
- (c)Quarterly rebalance
- (d)No commitment plan
- (a)Annual commitment to maintain target
- (b)Single lump sum
- (c)Quarterly rebalance
- (d)No commitment plan
Q 3Tier 3 liquidity = - (a)Daily
- (b)Monthly
- (c)Annual or longer
- (d)Hourly
- (a)Daily
- (b)Monthly
- (c)Annual or longer
- (d)Hourly
Q 4Endowment alternatives target typically:- (a)<5%
- (b)15-30%
- (c)60%
- (d)95%
- (a)<5%
- (b)15-30%
- (c)60%
- (d)95%
Q 5IDD includes:- (a)Counterparty
- (b)Custody
- (c)Strategy + track record + people + process
- (d)Cyber
- (a)Counterparty
- (b)Custody
- (c)Strategy + track record + people + process
- (d)Cyber