Active equity portfolio construction
In this chapter: Approaches: top-down vs bottom-up · Style classification (value, growth, blend) · Portfolio construction methods (concentrated, diversified, factor-based) · Long-only vs market-neutral
Once you have an active strategy, how do you build the portfolio? CFA L3 tests aligning approach with investment philosophy and managing risk.
Approaches: - **Top-down**: macro/sector → individual securities. Asset-allocation-driven. Quant-friendly. - **Bottom-up**: stock-by-stock fundamental analysis. Aggregates to portfolio. Style classification (Morningstar 9-box): - Value / Blend / Growth on horizontal. - Large / Mid / Small cap on vertical. Construction methods: - **Concentrated**: 20-40 stocks, high active share, high tracking error. - **Diversified**: 60-100 stocks, lower TE. - **Factor-based**: tilt to value, momentum, quality, low-volatility. - **Long-short**: 130/30, market-neutral, equity long-short. Key portfolio metrics: - Active share = Σ |w_p – w_b| / 2. >60% = active. - Tracking error (TE). - Information ratio (IR) = α/TE.
Risk budgeting: - Total active risk decomposed into systematic (factor) + idiosyncratic (security-specific). - Concentrated portfolio: more idiosyncratic risk. - Factor-based: more systematic factor risk. Long-only constraint: limits how negative an underweight can be (can't go below 0%). For small-cap underweights in benchmarks like Russell 2000, this binds heavily. 130/30 strategy: - 130% long, 30% short. - Net market exposure 100%. - Higher TE than long-only because shorts add active bets. - Improves transfer coefficient (constraints relaxed). Market-neutral: - Long and short balanced; near-zero market beta. - Pure alpha extraction. - Requires careful pair construction and risk management.
L3 essay: "Critique manager X's portfolio construction approach for client Y." Key factors to evaluate: - Alignment with mandate. - Active share consistency with claimed approach. - Concentration risk. - Factor exposures intentional or hidden. - Liquidity matched to client redemption needs. Factor crowding: when many managers tilt same factor, returns compress. Watch for risk-on regimes where factor risk concentrates.
- CFA Institute PM curriculum
- SEBI MF Regulations
- Mistaking style drift for active management.
- Confusing tracking error with active share.
- Ignoring liquidity in concentrated portfolios.
Frequently asked
High active share = high alpha?
Can long-only managers be truly market-neutral?
Practice questions
Click each question to reveal the answer and explanation.
Q 1Active share measures:- (a)Returns
- (b)How different portfolio is from benchmark
- (c)Trading volume
- (d)Fees
- (a)Returns
- (b)How different portfolio is from benchmark
- (c)Trading volume
- (d)Fees
Q 2Concentrated portfolio typically has:- (a)Lower idiosyncratic risk
- (b)Higher idiosyncratic risk
- (c)No factor risk
- (d)Zero TE
- (a)Lower idiosyncratic risk
- (b)Higher idiosyncratic risk
- (c)No factor risk
- (d)Zero TE
Q 3In 130/30 strategy:- (a)130% long only
- (b)130% long, 30% short, net 100%
- (c)Cash position
- (d)30% leverage
- (a)130% long only
- (b)130% long, 30% short, net 100%
- (c)Cash position
- (d)30% leverage
Q 4Long-only constraint hurts most for:- (a)Large-cap underweights
- (b)Small-cap underweights (can't go very negative)
- (c)Cash position
- (d)Currency
- (a)Large-cap underweights
- (b)Small-cap underweights (can't go very negative)
- (c)Cash position
- (d)Currency
Q 5Factor crowding leads to:- (a)Higher returns
- (b)Compressed factor returns
- (c)Lower volatility
- (d)No effect
- (a)Higher returns
- (b)Compressed factor returns
- (c)Lower volatility
- (d)No effect