Introduction to FSA
In this chapter: Three statements and relationships · IFRS vs US GAAP · Filing landscape
Three financial statements tell the firm's story. Balance Sheet (snapshot), Income Statement (period performance), Cash Flow Statement (period cash). They connect mathematically; reading them in isolation misses the story.
Balance Sheet: assets = liabilities + equity. Snapshot at moment. Income Statement: revenue − expenses = net income. Performance over period. Cash Flow Statement: cash in/out over period — operating, investing, financing. Connection: net income flows to retained earnings on balance sheet; cash flow ends at the cash balance. IFRS (used in India and most non-US markets) vs US GAAP (US): most differences technical: • Inventory: LIFO allowed in US GAAP, banned in IFRS • R&D: expensed in US GAAP, capitalised conditionally in IFRS • Revaluation of PP&E: allowed in IFRS, banned in US GAAP Indian listed: Ind-AS converged with IFRS as of 2016.
Filing landscape: • SEC: 10-K (annual), 10-Q (quarterly), 8-K (material events) — for US-listed • Indian: annual report + quarterly filings to BSE/NSE under SEBI LODR • Mandatory disclosures in both regimes Reading order recommendation: Cash Flow first (least manipulable), then Balance Sheet (structural change over time), then Income Statement (most manipulated). If income up but operating cash flow down: dig into working capital — possible aggressive revenue recognition or inventory build-up. Key adjustments needed for analysis: • Operating leases (now capitalised under IFRS 16/ASC 842) • Off-balance-sheet items • Special purpose vehicles • Pension/OPEB obligations
Practitioner insight: the cash flow statement is the truth-teller. Income statements are most manipulated; balance sheets show structural changes; cash flow is hard to fake. For Indian companies: post-Ind-AS adoption (2016), comparability with global peers improved dramatically. Earlier difficulties (Ind-GAAP vs IFRS gaps) largely resolved. Forensic analysis tools: • Beneish M-score (manipulation likelihood) • Altman Z-score (bankruptcy prediction) • Working capital trends • Aggressive vs conservative accounting choices
- IFRS standards (used in India)
- Ind-AS (2016 adoption)
- SEBI LODR Regulations
- CFA Institute curriculum
- Reading income statement in isolation.
- Ignoring cash flow vs income gaps.
- Not adjusting for IFRS vs US GAAP differences.
- Surface-level ratio analysis.
Frequently asked
Why read cash flow first?
Is Indian Ind-AS same as IFRS?
Practice questions
Click each question to reveal the answer and explanation.
Q 1The three financial statements:- (a)Income, Cash Flow, Balance Sheet
- (b)Income, Cash Flow, Trial Balance
- (c)Cash Flow only
- (d)Income, Balance Sheet, MD&A
- (a)Income, Cash Flow, Balance Sheet
- (b)Income, Cash Flow, Trial Balance
- (c)Cash Flow only
- (d)Income, Balance Sheet, MD&A
Q 2IFRS vs US GAAP — main difference for inventory:- (a)LIFO allowed in IFRS, banned in US GAAP
- (b)LIFO allowed in US GAAP, banned in IFRS
- (c)Same in both
- (d)IFRS uses LIFO; US GAAP doesn't recognize inventory
- (a)LIFO allowed in IFRS, banned in US GAAP
- (b)LIFO allowed in US GAAP, banned in IFRS
- (c)Same in both
- (d)IFRS uses LIFO; US GAAP doesn't recognize inventory
Q 3Cash flow statement sections:- (a)Cash from Profits, Cash from Loans
- (b)Operating, Investing, Financing
- (c)Sales, Costs, Profits
- (d)Income, Expenses
- (a)Cash from Profits, Cash from Loans
- (b)Operating, Investing, Financing
- (c)Sales, Costs, Profits
- (d)Income, Expenses
Q 4Indian listed companies follow:- (a)US GAAP
- (b)IFRS as Ind-AS (post-2016)
- (c)Indian-only standards
- (d)Pre-1991 rules
- (a)US GAAP
- (b)IFRS as Ind-AS (post-2016)
- (c)Indian-only standards
- (d)Pre-1991 rules
Q 5When income > cash from operations and trend is widening:- (a)Strong earnings quality
- (b)Yellow flag — possible earnings manipulation
- (c)No concern
- (d)Should buy more
- (a)Strong earnings quality
- (b)Yellow flag — possible earnings manipulation
- (c)No concern
- (d)Should buy more